Exploring the approaches to legacy system modernization
Legacy system modernization can be a daunting task, especially as there are several possible approaches that depend on a variety of factors like the complexity and size of the legacy system, available budget and core business priorities.
Some approaches, while simpler and less costly to execute, come with their own set of problems.
Encapsulation
Some companies have considered encapsulation, which involves wrapping existing systems (i.e., legacy components or functionalities) within newer, modernized architecture — this means that only the interface layer is altered. The idea is that since new data and functions are applied using an external API, entire processes are still controlled via legacy systems.
This is a phased approach to modernization, but encapsulation doesn’t solve several of the problems companies are already facing when considering legacy system modernization, especially involving difficulties with maintenance, integration and upgrading.
Encapsulation also poses additional challenges, one being performance overhead. This actually increases computational resources (such as CPU, memory and network bandwidth) or time required by a system or application to execute additional tasks or processes. Instead of solving operational complexities, encapsulation adds to them as companies must maintain and manage the encapsulation layer on top of the legacy system. Encapsulation creates dependencies between the legacy system and the encapsulation layer, meaning changes or updates to the legacy system can also impact the encapsulation layer — potentially causing disruptions and issues in functionality.
Depending on how encapsulation is implemented, organizations may become dependent on specific vendors or proprietary technologies to maintain the encapsulation layer, limiting flexibility and vendor choice.
Federation of legacy systems
While a modern ECM is capable of federating content from legacy repositories, old-fashioned tools may require federating legacy systems. This happens when multiple independent solutions, including legacy systems, are integrated to work together as a unified system . The purpose of this is to leverage the strengths of each, while providing seamless access to data and functionality across the integrated environment.
However, this type of federation involves establishing communication protocols, data standards and integration patterns to facilitate interoperability between these systems. As the number of systems that are involved in the federation increases, more time and resources will be needed to establish and manage them.
Maintaining data consistency across federated systems can be challenging, as organizations need to deal with siloed data sources — going against the purpose of modernizing systems to eliminate this. Federation instead introduces performance bottlenecks, especially when there are large volumes of data involved. Downtime or performance issues in one federated system can cascade to affect other interconnected systems, leading to service disruptions or data inconsistencies.
Federation and security
Companies often consider legacy system modernization to mitigate security risks, yet federating systems potentially increases the risk of security vulnerabilities. However, leading modern ECM platforms approach federation differently, federating content repositories rather than legacy systems. ECM content federation enables modern ECM platforms to manage content not only within its repository but also across the many siloed repositories, including legacy ECM platforms, file shares, email and more.
With a manage-in-place approach, a single content solution platform allows organizations to apply its overarching content management strategy (a records management policy, for example), regardless of where content resides in the enterprise. With that type of foundational content solution, different business units can store content in the systems that make sense for them, and records and information management professionals could control, protect and manage content centrally and in a way that works for the entire organization.
Content migration and federation
By leveraging ECM content federation, organizations can avoid the slow, complex, error-prone and expensive content migration that is often required when modernizing ECM platforms. Modern ECM platforms that include content federation, including Hyland’s Alfresco and Nuxeo platforms, can manage content in place without requiring any content migration.
Rehosting and replatforming
Rehosting and replatforming are alternate modernization strategies companies may consider.
Rehosting involves moving current applications from on-premises to a cloud or different hardware with minimal code changes, called “lift and shift” — transferring applications and databases to the cloud and adjusting them to work in the new setting. Replatforming has a similar approach, with an additional step known as “tinkering”, or making minor adjustments like updating configurations, adjusting settings or optimizing code for better performance.
There are drawbacks to both approaches. Rehosting doesn’t address underlying issues and inefficiencies in application architecture. By simply migrating applications into a new environment, systems can still continue to exhibit previous limitations such as performance bottlenecks, inflexible scalability and maintenance challenges.
Replatforming involves modifying the application or system to adapt to the target platform's requirements or constraints, which presents double work (instead of simplifying processes) due to the differences between source and target environments. There is also a risk of setting the wrong configurations, settings and code, introducing even more complexity and potential risks to a legacy system not equipped to protect itself.
By selecting rehosting or replatforming, companies must accept the risk that these approaches don’t address technical debt or legacy issues in the application codebase. This can perpetuate existing problems and increase complexity over time, as these migrated applications may become more difficult to maintain and evolve in the future — costing companies much more to do so.
Replacing
Many companies have concluded they no longer require legacy systems at all and have chosen to replace the system entirely.
Replacing legacy systems with completely new solutions would incorporate necessary features and functionality to meet your organization’s current and future needs, while also eliminating obsolete elements from the old system, reducing long-term maintenance costs and significantly contributing to increased ROI.
New, modern solutions enable organizations to incorporate the latest technologies, functionalities and features to address current business problems, providing an opportunity for companies to align their systems closely with their goals and objectives to support future growth.
New solutions are designed with scalability, performance and efficiency — crucial capabilities for today’s industry landscape — and leverage cloud-native architectures to enhance improved system performance, responsiveness and capability to store, manage and sort large data volumes. This allows organizations to handle growing workloads and user demands effectively.
Modern solutions also empower organizations to innovate and differentiate themselves in the market by leveraging cutting-edge technologies, such as AI, machine learning and advanced data analytics.