How AI can help DAM in marketing
Marketers are tasked with managing an explosive growth of content to satisfy an increasing number of marketing channels. Many of these channels require specific and specialized formats, languages and variants on a global scale. The result is the prioritization of digital asset management as a foundation for any marketing content ecosystem.
For many years the key promise of DAM was that it helped organizations store and manage assets in a central location where they can be found and retrieved easily. However, this promise lost efficacy as marketers activated content in increasingly diverse digital and physical channels, leading assets to be stored and managed in disparate systems. Often, large enterprises create multiple DAMs that don’t communicate with each other and have little or no common metadata.
Additionally, new content types such as complex video and 3D models are often unsupported by older DAM solutions.
Learn more: DAM best practices to optimize efficiency
The power of metadata
Bridging different content repositories and silos can be achieved using platforms that support the concept of federated search. To support that indexing, correct, relevant and consistent metadata is essential.
This is where AI and ML adds real benefits in eliminating the frustrations and cost of looking for assets.
The benefit and value of AI is not just about knowing what questions to ask or what models to build. It comes from connecting AI with the right sources of data.
The value of ML comes from helping to build those data sources in the right way, at scale. ML can apply the right information to the right assets at speeds that are impossible for a group of human subject matter experts to do manually, and in a consistent way.
One hotel’s battle vs. 1,000+ images
Consider a hotel chain using first-generation asset management tools. It needs to categorize thousands of photographs to ensure the right ones are displayed at the right place in online and print promotional materials:
- Someone needs to manually check each photograph and decide if it represents a guest room, bar, conference room, ballroom, etc.
- Even a well-trained eye may take 10 seconds or so to make that decision.
- Human attention is bound to wander with such a repetitive task, leading to mistakes and inconsistent tagging (bedroom instead of guest room) that results in a lower level of quality (most human-produced tags are only 80–85% accurate).
Metadata woes: While there is a general acceptance of the importance of metadata, no one really wants to be responsible for applying it. Even with DAM and other content management systems that have workflows to make metadata entry a required step when uploading an asset, the results are often minimal and inconsistent.
Paradoxically, the more you know about an asset and what it contains the more useful it becomes. If you take the hotel chain’s situation and apply AI and ML, the images could be automatically (and correctly) tagged with all the proper metadata — hotel location, date of shoot, photographer, area of hotel, lighting, campaigns it should be used in, etc., — immediately upon entering the digital supply chain. No more 10 seconds per picture, no more begging someone, somewhere to attach metadata.
A manufacturer’s entire digital lifecycle depends on just 4 people
Consider an apparel manufacturer that depends on its talented people to make its processes work smoothly downstream:
- One expert can recognize and tag the clothes in a photograph
Another expert can identify which models are in a particular photoshoot
Yet another can identify which campaign a photoshoot was done for
A photographer can apply information on the shoot logistics
That’s a lot of people just to tag one image (assuming they take time to do it), and it all depends on their locked-up knowledge. Imagine trying to do that for thousands, or tens of thousands, of assets. It just doesn’t scale.
As we discussed earlier, without the right metadata, it is almost impossible to find the right assets at the right time, leading to time lost in searching and in recreating them/
However, with trained AI and ML models in place, a modern DAM solution would:
- Recognize, categorize and find the clothing in a photograph (including any associated items such as hats, bags, shoes, etc.), allowing for intelligent cross-selling on e-commerce platforms
- Recognize, categorize and find specific models used
- Connect assets to relevant contracts, digital rights management rules, campaigns and more
- Link designs to materials libraries and sales information so you know when to order new materials based on an item’s popularity
The sort of problems outlined above, where we need to automate repetitive tasks that need some degree of human intervention and specialist knowledge, are perfectly suited to the application of AI and machine learning.
Generic AI services vs. custom AI models based on your data
Generic AI services connect to a broad set of public services for common use cases (general classification, enrichment, OCR, speech-to-text, etc.) and use commodity models to provide those generic services. Example: It may tag a particular vehicle as being a red pickup truck, but that is as detailed as it will go.
Custom models deliver more meaningful outcomes for the business by training machine learning models on your content and data to get highly relevant insights and enrichments. This enables specific business use cases across defined domains. Example: A custom model will identify that red pickup truck as a 2023 Ford F-150 Lightning, and maybe even recognize which types of accessories have been installed.
The result is not about training the ML to perform a repetitive task, it’s about developing a system where the output can be trusted by humans to deliver what they want, at the time they need it. From a DAM perspective, this means being able to locate the right image at the right time for the right use case.